PGP Desktop Email - 9.10PGP security/encryption for IM, email, virtual disks. |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Feedback Summary:
| This Version: | |||||
| Overall Rating: | Not rated (0.0) | Features: | Not rated (0.0) | Support: | Not rated (0.0) |
| Ease of Use: | Not rated (0.0) | Quality / Stability: | Not rated (0.0) | Price: | Not rated (0.0) |
Key to Types of Feedback:
Reviews
Troubleshooting
Usage Tips
Developer Notes
Commentary
Featured Reviews
9.9.1 looks good so far 



- Version: 9.9.1, 2/11/2009 01:59AM PST
(2 of 2 users found this comment useful)
plaintiger
Go back to your purchase confirmation... 



- Version: 9.9, 1/9/2009 07:54PM PST
(3 of 3 users found this comment useful)
m-bombI have never had the kind of problems with this product other people do. And I am not a moron, nor a PGP employee.
Yawn. Where is it? - Version: 9.9.1, 1/8/2009 08:55PM PST
(0 of 2 users found this comment useful)
grh-aklMost Recent Replies: View All 1 Replies
- Broken Links = Contact VT!
i've been using PGP products on and off for years, and like others i have had some problems with their bugs, user-hostile interfaces/installation procedures, and questionable support. i can't claim to have really put it through its paces yet, but i will say that so far, PGP Desktop Home 9.9.1 is the least problematic PGP product i've used. it installed properly the first time (*that's* never happened before) and i haven't yet seen any unexpected behaviors...all of which - especially in light of the nightmares wrought by my attempt to use the free, open-source substitutes (GPGThis, GPGThat, and GPGTheOtherThing) - are very welcome.
my experience isn't very extensive, but as far as it goes, it indicates that PGP's the security package to use. 9.9.1 appears solid, and the alternatives i've tried definitely suck.
good luck...