Existing users, log in.  New users, create a free account.  Lost password?

Mac OS X  |  Security / Privacy  |  Antivirus  |  Intego VirusBarrier X Virus Definitions

Intego VirusBarrier X Virus Definitions

Intego VirusBarrier X Virus Definitions - 12/03/2007

(use NetUpdate)

All Time: (2.8)
This Version: Not rated (0.0)
Current Version: 12/03/2007
Release Date: 2007-08-01
License: Update
Downloads (this version): 4,639
Downloads (all versions): 15,087

Feedback Summary:

This Version:
Overall Rating: Not rated (0.0) Features: Not rated (0.0) Support: Not rated (0.0)
Ease of Use: Not rated (0.0) Quality / Stability: Not rated (0.0) Price: Not rated (0.0)
Add Your Feedback

Key to Types of Feedback:

ReviewsReviews   TroubleshootingTroubleshooting   Usage TipsUsage Tips   Developer NotesDeveloper Notes   CommentaryCommentary   Featured ReviewsFeatured Reviews

All Feedback: 1 - 10 of 30 |  1 2 3 Next



Intego VirusBarrier X Virus Definitions ReviewGood Product - Version: November, 3/31/2005 04:02PM PST

(4 of 4 users found this comment useful)

HgWells1
Like others, I have used both VirusBarrier and NetBarrier for a number of years. I have had no problems with them. They have both proved superior to other applications I have used. VirusBarrier has caught viruses that both Virex and NAV missed. I no longer even have Norton on my computer and only have Virex because it was free. Unlike another post, I do find NetBarrier a little harder to work with than I would like, but that is in part because it does as much as it does. I would like a list of ports somewhere so I know what I might have to open when I need something obscure to open. Otherwise it is powerful and effective. I recommend both VirusBarrier and NetBarrier to new Mac owners. I don't like the annual upgrade fee for NetBarrier since they don't seem to add much for it. I (and others) seem to review VirusBarrier and NetBarrier at the same time because there is a feeling they do go together. Both are good and I recommend both. I have rarely needed support so I can't comment on that. Years ago I did call them and received good service. That was my only need for a service question. I know Intego messed up a while back with their news releases, but their products are good. Hopefully, they learned from that episode.
Post a commentAlert Admin

Most Recent Replies: View All 1 Replies

Intego VirusBarrier X Virus Definitions ReviewFully effective, simple to use, and cheap - Version: November, 3/31/2005 02:31PM PST

(2 of 2 users found this comment useful)

barrylane
Where do some of these commentators come from? I've been using this software for a year and it's great. It works perfectly with Panther, updates quickly and easily and as far as I'm concerned, is priced quite fairly. I'm so pleased that I ignored the critics and went with Intego. I will be more than happy to renew my annual subscription when it's due in June.
Post a commentAlert Admin

Intego VirusBarrier X Virus Definitions ReviewI have to disagree (as to the quality complaints) - Version: November, 3/31/2005 10:43AM PST

(3 of 3 users found this comment useful)

jreffner
I have used NAV for over 10 years, and I've been using it along with VirusBarrier X for the last 5 months. I must attest to the fact that Virus Barrier X is far faster than NAV at scanning drives (minutes vs. hours), but this is due to the fact that VBX keeps track of the files and only scanns the ones that have changed (which I don't see as a bad thing at all). I have also never had a problem with the stability of features of the app. Many grip about the daemon, but it has been flawless. In fact, it has done a better job scanning incoming email than NAV does. NetUpdate has also never caused me a problem either. The only thing NAV does better than VBX is that they update their defs weekly whereas Intego only does it each month. This app is a very fine one. Try the demo for yourself and don't be turned off by the numerous negative reviews.
Post a commentAlert Admin

Intego VirusBarrier X Virus Definitions ReviewFortunately, people DO change their minds... - Version: February, 2/3/2004 08:10AM PST

(0 of 1 users found this comment useful)

KR.
http://www.versiontracker.com/php/feedback/article.php?story=20040127023212246
Post a commentAlert Admin

Intego VirusBarrier X Virus Definitions ReviewBad Support - Version: February, 1/30/2004 09:52AM PST

rmorton
Part of my job is to review software for thousands of Macintosh computers. I reviewed virus software and Intego was at the top of the list at the time. This was prior to Norton scanning for PC viruses or Sophos being a complete product. Then the communication with them stopped. It eventually started again with some excuses about how they have move, ended up changing some personnel, etc. I gave them another chance. Then the communication stopped again and never returned. This was for a minimum of 450 licenses if they were picked as the best and could have been used across the board. My guess is there is no chance an individual would get better support. I rated the Support Poor, but n/a may have been more appropriate. Sophos has by far the best support of the anti Virus companies.
Post a commentAlert Admin

Intego VirusBarrier X Virus Definitions ReviewTHREE THUMBS DOWN!!! Intego Sucks! - Version: August, 1/3/2004 09:20PM PST

Glitschka Studios
Sorry but that may sound harsh but unfortunately it is true. Not only do I use Virus Barrier but I use Content Barrier and the stinkin' app is now blocking all kinds of stuff it shouldn't and I can't fix it. I've e-mailed tech support, sent in official tech help requests and have received a BIG FAT ZERO in response. I make no joke when I say "This is the worst customer service I have ever received since first operating a computer back in '91." I even went out of my way and called the company and the receptionist was rude, I left more then two voice mails and never got a call back or an e-mail?

I paid $59 for Content Barrier and now regret it. This company really is a joke.

INTEGO PRODUCTS AND SUPPORT SUCKS! DO NOT GIVE THEM YOUR BUSINESS.
Post a commentAlert Admin

Intego VirusBarrier X Virus Definitions ReviewVirus Barrier 10.1 - Version: August, 11/29/2003 02:53PM PST

enriquezamora
Do not buy Intego´s products if you want to avoid any trouble, technical support does not exist in that company.
Post a commentAlert Admin

Intego VirusBarrier X Virus Definitions Usage TipNetUpdate usage tips and download link - Version: August, 8/31/2003 08:31AM PST

supportfr
Hi,

Please, get our latest NetUpdate software using the link below, if you are unable to update any of your installed Intego software using your currently installed NetUpdate.

Note that NetUpdate requires that the BSD SubSystem be installed on your computer.

To install the BSD SubSystem separately, do the following:

1/ check that it is installed:
- launch Terminal from Applications/Utilities,
- at the prompt, type 'grep' (w/o quotes) and hit the Enter key,
- if the response reads "Command not found", this means that the BSD SubSystem is NOT installed,
- type 'exit' (w/o quotes) to close the Terminal session, and then quit.

2/ Install the BSD SubSystem manually:
- insert your MacOS X 10.2 install CD #1,
- search the CD for the "BSD SubSystem.pkg" install package, double-click it when found,
- perform the installation, and then restart,

3/ Download and install NetUpdate 10.2.7:
- NetUpdate 10.2.7.,
- this version contains installers for all supported languages: English, French,
German, Italian, Spanish and Japanese.

Thank you,
Karim, Intego Technical Support - Europe
Post a commentAlert Admin

Intego VirusBarrier X Virus Definitions Troubleshooting ReportSolution to daemon error in VirusBarrier X - Version: August, 8/9/2003 04:54PM PST

Extraordinaire

I too suspect folks that have the issue where the VirusBarrier X daemon does not launch successfully on their Macintosh also are running the haxie, by UnSanity, named FruitMenu.

When you boot up your Mac a VirusBarrier error message appears on the screen just at the end of the startup process. Right?

I believe versions of FruitMenu up to the current version - v3.1.1 - will prevent the VirusBarrier X daemon from running in Mac OS X, Jaguar.

The solution to the VirusBarrier X daemon not running when you boot up your Mac is to include the VirusBarrier X application program in the - Excluded List - in FruitMenu. This is accomplished by launching the Mac OS X System Preferences, then inside click on the FruitMenu icon, then go the the tab labeled - Exclude List - then click the button on the top right named - Add - then quit out of the System Preferences.

FruitMenu says changes will take effect the next time you launch the excluded application, namely VirusBarrier X. For better confirmation I recommend putting VirusBarrier X back into the System Preferences - Login Items - then reboot your computer. The problem should not occur this time. Issue Resolved.

I am not a tech support person for VirusBarrier X. I am just a long time Mac user.

Hope I helped.
Extraordinaire
Post a commentAlert Admin

Intego VirusBarrier X Virus Definitions Reviewdaemon running just fine - Version: August, 8/3/2003 06:07AM PST

Ton008
For all those people who have the famous "daemon not running" problem: I discovered years ago (well, eh, since VirusBarrier X was released actually) that the daemon problem was solved by disabling a haxie called FruitMenu (version 1.5 and earlier, if I remember correctly). I suggest y'all check your Application Enhancers and Preference Panes folders and do some experimenting.

In my experience VirusBarrier X is a rocksolid product - it discovered some nasty virrii that were 'safely' passed by Virex and dr. Norton himself. It's got some nice touches that other antivirus apps lack, it's reasonably fast and its update mechanism is absolutely stunning. I love it.
Post a commentAlert Admin