Existing users, log in.  New users, create a free account.  Lost password?

Mac OS X  |  System / Utilities  |  Other System / Utilities  |  Xbench

Xbench

Xbench - 1.3

benchmarking utility

All Time: (4.0)
This Version: Not rated (0.0)
Current Version: 1.3
Release Date: 2006-08-13
License: Freeware
Downloads (this version): 42,019
Downloads (all versions): 148,653

Information Related to Version:

Broken Link? Newer Version? Tell us!

Product Description:

Xbench was developed to provide a comprehensive benchmarking solution for Mac OS X. Xbench is useful not only for comparing the relative speeds of two different Macintoshes, but also for optimizing performance on a single machine. Xbench is accompanied by a website that allows graphical side-by-side comparison of any out of thousands of submitted benchmarks.

What's new in this version:

  • Corrected a mistake that caused the altivec test to be turned off on PowerPC machines
  • Turned off coalesced graphics updates for all platforms on Mac OS 10.4.4 and higher
  • Switched compiler to GCC 4.0 on PowerPC. This provides some boost to floating point and AltiVec scores, and these have been recalibrated accordingly. This also raises Xbench's system requirements to 10.3.9 or higher.
  • Revised machine database to include the MacBook, Intel iMac and several other models
  • Added code to dynamically load machine database on launch from the Xbench website
  • Added support for temporarily turning off beam sync on Tiger while running graphics tests
  • Fixed an issue that causes Xbench to fail to launch on Leopard
  • Built with Xcode 2.4

Operating System Requirements:

This product is designed to run on the following operating systems:

  • Mac OS X 10.4 Intel
  • Mac OS X 10.4 PPC
  • Mac OS X 10.3.9

Additional Requirements:

  • Mac OS X 10.3.9 or higher
  • Universal Binary

Screenshots:

Download Links:

Your Installed Versions:


 

Feedback Summary:

This Version:
Overall Rating: Not rated (0.0) Features: Not rated (0.0) Support: Not rated (0.0)
Ease of Use: Not rated (0.0) Quality / Stability: Not rated (0.0) Price: Not rated (0.0)
Add Your Feedback

Key to Types of Feedback:

ReviewsReviews   TroubleshootingTroubleshooting   Usage TipsUsage Tips   Developer NotesDeveloper Notes   CommentaryCommentary   Featured ReviewsFeatured Reviews

Xbench CommentaryOverdue for an update - Version: 1.3, 4/2/2009 03:34PM PST

BradMacPro87
it's getting to be two and a half years old. Not optimized for Mac OS 10.5 or Nehalem processors.
Post a commentAlert Admin

Xbench Review1.3 Still featurless and uninformative!!! - Version: 1.3, 9/19/2007 04:09AM PST

(0 of 2 users found this comment useful)

Tesselator
XBench seems to be all that there is for Mac as benchmarking goes.

It's clearly the worst benchmarking application I've ever used on ANY platform. Even ancient Amiga or Windows 2 benchmarking utilities kick the crud out of this. It supplies you with no interesting information and only runs stupidly simple non-real-world tests. It doesn't know and can't test multiple CPU cores (single core tests ONLY) so it's not even good for that really. It might be ok for testing various drive configurations but that would be about it.

XBench 1.3 is just another in a series of let-downs. When will Mac users get a REAL benchmarking suite?

Post a commentAlert Admin

Most Recent Replies: View All 1 Replies

Xbench CommentaryI can't understand the results - Version: 1.3, 6/27/2007 01:50AM PST

(1 of 1 users found this comment useful)

davidasta1
If you take a look in the "Results Comparison Site" (http://db.xbench.com/) and you order by "Average Score", the results are a bit unbelievable.

How is possible that a Mac mini (Intel) is more powerful than a MacBook Pro and MacBook?

How is possible that an AppleTV is more powerful than a iMac G5 and a Mac mini (PPC)?

And looking inside the models, how is possible that a MacBook with similar results than mine, even worse in some cases, have a better performance, more than 30.68%?

Compare, for example "Macbook" MacBook vs "DAG Computer" MacBook.

Are the results absolutely trustworthy?
Post a commentAlert Admin