Xbench - 1.3benchmarking utility |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
Feedback Summary:
| This Version: | |||||
| Overall Rating: | Not rated (0.0) | Features: | Not rated (0.0) | Support: | Not rated (0.0) |
| Ease of Use: | Not rated (0.0) | Quality / Stability: | Not rated (0.0) | Price: | Not rated (0.0) |
Key to Types of Feedback:
Reviews
Troubleshooting
Usage Tips
Developer Notes
Commentary
Featured Reviews
Overdue for an update - Version: 1.3, 4/2/2009 03:34PM PST
BradMacPro87
1.3 Still featurless and uninformative!!! 



- Version: 1.3, 9/19/2007 04:09AM PST
(0 of 2 users found this comment useful)
TesselatorIt's clearly the worst benchmarking application I've ever used on ANY platform. Even ancient Amiga or Windows 2 benchmarking utilities kick the crud out of this. It supplies you with no interesting information and only runs stupidly simple non-real-world tests. It doesn't know and can't test multiple CPU cores (single core tests ONLY) so it's not even good for that really. It might be ok for testing various drive configurations but that would be about it.
XBench 1.3 is just another in a series of let-downs. When will Mac users get a REAL benchmarking suite?
Most Recent Replies: View All 1 Replies
- XBench, SpeedTools, Power Fractal
I can't understand the results - Version: 1.3, 6/27/2007 01:50AM PST
(1 of 1 users found this comment useful)
davidasta1How is possible that a Mac mini (Intel) is more powerful than a MacBook Pro and MacBook?
How is possible that an AppleTV is more powerful than a iMac G5 and a Mac mini (PPC)?
And looking inside the models, how is possible that a MacBook with similar results than mine, even worse in some cases, have a better performance, more than 30.68%?
Compare, for example "Macbook" MacBook vs "DAG Computer" MacBook.
Are the results absolutely trustworthy?