Mocha MacX TN5250 - 1.85250 emulator connects to AS/400 servers |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Feedback Summary:
| Version 1.8: | |||||
| Overall Rating: | Features: | Support: | |||
| Ease of Use: | Quality / Stability: | Price: | |||
Key to Types of Feedback:
Reviews
Troubleshooting
Usage Tips
Developer Notes
Commentary
Featured Reviews
Two thumbs up - Version: 1.8, 11/1/2007 09:49AM PST
(0 of 1 users found this comment useful)
rjmorita_dotmac
Although I have not tried the Mac version of TN5250, I have been using the PC version at work for years.
It's an excellent piece of software and the company provides good support. Plus you cannot beat the price.
I think it's safe to assume that the Mac version is as good or even better. If I were able to access my company's AS/400 from home, I would definitely buy it.
It's an excellent piece of software and the company provides good support. Plus you cannot beat the price.
I think it's safe to assume that the Mac version is as good or even better. If I were able to access my company's AS/400 from home, I would definitely buy it.
Two thumbs up - Version: 1.8, 11/1/2007 09:40AM PST
(0 of 1 users found this comment useful)
rjmorita_dotmac
Although I have not tried the Mac version of TN5250, I have been using the PC version at work for years.
It's an excellent piece of software and the company provides good support. Plus you cannot beat the price.
I think it's safe to assume that the Mac version is as good or even better. If I were able to access my company's AS/400 from home, I would definitely buy it.
It's an excellent piece of software and the company provides good support. Plus you cannot beat the price.
I think it's safe to assume that the Mac version is as good or even better. If I were able to access my company's AS/400 from home, I would definitely buy it.
LANDSCAPE printing.. I was upset to get their curt response to my rationale- as for a better experience. Well its better than telnet into the server directly but some simple additions such as the above is needed. Still its cheaper than Cellview (not better).