Existing users, log in.  New users, create a free account.  Lost password?

Mac OS X  |  Home / Education  |  Food / Beverage  |  Yum

Yum

Yum - 3.2.0

Recipe cookbook manager with sample recipes.

All Time: (4.4)
This Version: Not rated (0.0)
Current Version: 3.2.0
Release Date: 2009-05-05
License: Shareware
Downloads (this version): 2,655
Downloads (all versions): 72,348
Price: $26.00

Feedback Summary:

This Version:
Overall Rating: Not rated (0.0) Features: Not rated (0.0) Support: Not rated (0.0)
Ease of Use: Not rated (0.0) Quality / Stability: Not rated (0.0) Price: Not rated (0.0)
Add Your Feedback

Key to Types of Feedback:

ReviewsReviews   TroubleshootingTroubleshooting   Usage TipsUsage Tips   Developer NotesDeveloper Notes   CommentaryCommentary   Featured ReviewsFeatured Reviews

All Feedback: 1 - 10 of 52 |  1 2 3 4 5 6 Next



Yum ReviewUniquely simple entry - Version: 3.0.1, 12/8/2008 02:41PM PST

(0 of 1 users found this comment useful)

sun2
I was just evaluating a couple recipe managers and Yum won hands down.

Yum just let me paste the whole text all in one go and separated everything out into measurement, unit and ingredient. Every other app I tried required me to enter all the ingredients one by one. For some I even had to do the measurements, units and ingredient in their own fields.

If you ever copy whole recipes then there is no other recipe manager coming even close.

Two small wishes: a) picture, b) category (in particular smart categories)
Post a commentAlert Admin

Most Recent Replies: View All 1 Replies

Yum CommentaryDonation registration not working with Commercial upgrade - Version: 3.0.1, 12/7/2008 06:19AM PST

(4 of 4 users found this comment useful)

mailing.lists.2005
Previous versions of Yum were donationware (not freeware as some have said), and probably few sent in donations. However for those of us who did donate, our previous rego information is not working with the updated version and I'm not seeing any upgrade option on pricing. Will there be or do we stick with version 2.7.3?
Post a commentAlert Admin

Yum ReviewYummy! - Version: 3.0.1, 11/24/2008 12:36PM PST

(1 of 1 users found this comment useful)

Henry Halem
This is an excellent piece of software. The GUI is slick and is very intuitive. If you're like me and cut and paste recipes from the internet then this is the software to store them in. It places the quantities, ingredients, and cooking method in discreet areas. It can print or email a shopping list and can save to an iPod or save as plain text. Best of all you can scale the recipe to serve 2 or a banquet. One thing I would like to see in a future upgrade is a place for a picture. Note: There is a sampler Yum cookbook that comes with the download and does have a few recipes that have metric measurements but most are not.This software is for your recipes and will have misspelled words if you misspell them and the measurements are the measurements you enter. I give Yum a big thumbs up!
Post a commentAlert Admin

Yum CommentaryNot freeware any more - Version: 3.0.1, 11/20/2008 09:36AM PST

(3 of 3 users found this comment useful)

JohnnyBuck
Yum USED TO be freeware. As of version 3.0, they are charging $19.95 for the product.
Post a commentAlert Admin

Yum CommentaryYum 3.0 is no longer free - Version: 3.0, 11/17/2008 09:19AM PST

(5 of 5 users found this comment useful)

Marty.Skinner
I have no problem with the developers charging for good software, but for those like me that see this new release in VersionTracker and see it listed as Freeware... it's not. And it's no longer Tiger friendly.

I don't know if it's Shareware or Commercial, but their website lists the price as $19.95. A demo version is available for download.

/Marty
Post a commentAlert Admin

Yum CommentarySpelling - Version: 2.7, 10/5/2008 09:55PM PST

(0 of 2 users found this comment useful)

sirron33
I looked at three recipes and found 2 spelling mistakes. How do I know that the recipes have been checked for accuracy? Very unprofessional.
Post a commentAlert Admin

Most Recent Replies: View All 2 Replies

Yum ReviewNice Interface, But.... - Version: 2.1, 3/9/2007 09:09PM PST

(0 of 6 users found this comment useful)

Wheels06010
The ingredient measurements are not in US form. kg??
Post a commentAlert Admin

Most Recent Replies: View All 3 Replies

Yum ReviewYum - Version: 1.2, 8/19/2006 05:40PM PST

(5 of 5 users found this comment useful)

Alisa Aiken
This product is amazing. I have a data base of 8000 or more recipes. I used Mastercook Mac. Yum has all the advantages plus - all the things I didn't like about Mastercook are fixed in Yum.
Intuitive, Easy to Use, Easy to find the recipe you want.
I would recommend it to anyone who wants to keep their recipes on their Mac.
Post a commentAlert Admin

Yum ReviewSimple recipe manager (Review and product comparison) - Version: 0.7.8, 4/25/2006 09:33AM PST

(5 of 8 users found this comment useful)

kalsta

Good:

  • Individual serve scaling

Bad:

  • No automated filtering or classification of recipes
  • No shopping list
  • No weekly meal planner

The programs I tested, roughly in order of preference were:

  1. Connoisseur 1.1.7 (great interface)
  2. A Cook's Books 0.9.19 (feature rich)
  3. Shop'NCook 3.1 (includes nutritional database)
  4. Organized Gourmet 1.2 (calendar based meal planning)
  5. MacGourmet 1.1.7 (attractive interface, includes wine notes)
  6. iCuistot 1.1.1 (includes nutritional database — sort of)
  7. Kitchen 1.0 (simple interface)
  8. Yum 0.7.8 (simple recipe manager)
  9. Measuring Cup 1.1.1 (simple interface)
  10. CookWare Deluxe 2.1 (includes a very basic meal planner)
  11. The Computer Cookbook 3.1

Note: There are many others that I didn't test at all because they looked less promising, based on their descriptions and other people's reviews. There is one commercial product (TheRecipeManager) I refuse to test because of the developer's crazy policy of buy before you try. While I have tried to give a fair and honest appraisal of each product, I don't pretend that each review is exhaustive or totally without error. If I have overlooked any feature, it's possibly an indication that the feature was difficult to find or unintuitive to use.

Post a commentAlert Admin