GPG Keychain Access - 0.7.0GnuPG key management |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
Feedback Summary:
| This Version: | |||||
| Overall Rating: | Not rated (0.0) | Features: | Not rated (0.0) | Support: | Not rated (0.0) |
| Ease of Use: | Not rated (0.0) | Quality / Stability: | Not rated (0.0) | Price: | Not rated (0.0) |
Key to Types of Feedback:
Reviews
Troubleshooting
Usage Tips
Developer Notes
Commentary
Featured Reviews
Fails to create keys - Version: 0.7.0, 11/30/2006 08:55AM PST
(1 of 1 users found this comment useful)
hamarkusMost Recent Replies: View All 1 Replies
- Fails to create keys
MacGPG - GPG Keychain Access 0.7.0 - Version: 0.7.0, 2/15/2005 01:06AM PST
shavital2
GnuPG can import keys generated with versions of PGP. The HOWTO is documented in <http://www.gnupg.org/>, and commented in various mailing lists.
No complaints at… 



- Version: 0.5.2, 9/28/2002 07:39AM PST
pderby
all from me. This utility does what it says it does. The fact that all the GPG pieces aren't rolled up into one offering isn't the fault of the great folks that have collaborated to put together all the parts as a totally volunteer effort. Thanks to the author of this utility and his GPG developer colleagues!!!
I believe somewhere… 



- Version: 0.5.2, 9/28/2002 04:56AM PST
John Petty
in the associated manuals involving GPG, it states you should have the terminal open before opening GPG Keys. Otherwise it doesn't do anything the first time. Has always worked for me. I also wish for one-step does all installation for GPG. I believe then more people would use it.
Crashes immediatly after… - Version: 0.2.1, 9/21/2002 12:52PM PST
morini4me
start up (like 0.5). Never got it running with my keyring - only after removing my public keyring.
Works great for… 



- Version: 0.2.1, 8/13/2002 06:57AM PST
pderby
my needs. Will second the motion to roll all the pieces up into a package for ease of installation. I used FINK Commander to do a painless compile and install of GPG. That was easy to do but painful to watch the dozens of CLI entries fly by on the screen as FINK did all the work. Makes me really appreciate not having to do CLI anymore than I have to even though I'm pretty comfortable in the CLI environment, too.
Bringing a convenient,… - Version: 0.2.1, 8/12/2002 05:35PM PST
Punisher 007
simple, efficient GUI to a complicated, powerful computing tool takes a lot of work and creativity. More work and creativity than many programmers are capable of. Those who bash the GUI are either full of themselves or are just plain ignorant about how people productively interface with machines. CLI's have their place, still, and I find it quite handy for certain operations, but by and large the GUI is the way to go for everyday use. I agree, Levon, the current state of public key crypto tools for OS X is *lame*!
none of the… 



- Version: 0.2.1, 7/20/2002 09:59PM PST
jerome_
functions that use the terminal work... brings terminal forward but no attempt at doing anything is made
It's curious that… - Version: 0.2.1, 5/12/2002 06:21PM PST
Jeff Mincey
even some Mac users mistakenly associate power with degree of difficulty (which is the same mistake the old proponents of DOS made long ago). Something onerous to use may be quite underpowered, just as something very intuitive and relatively easy to use may be very powerful. I make frequent use of the command line, (and it has its place), but like Levon River, I appreciate the efforts of developers who spare users the need to do their own compiling of source code (to say nothing of using a CLI). It's ironic that a developer who seeks to make life easier for users with a GUI would at the same time require them to make their own binaries.
hekal, you mean… - Version: 0.2.1, 5/12/2002 05:37AM PST
Levon River
generalizing like "if it has a GUI that means it's dummified"? Many extremely complex and professional programs have elegant GUIs. I know how to navigate a CLI or shell or terminal on several platforms, but that doesn't mean it's always the most convenient or efficient or "best" way by any means. And more than a few find the current state of PGP for OS X abysmal, and are urging programmers who can to please help make it more user-friendly and accessible, and, no, that doesn't mean we're all dummified.
(And I did install GnuPG 1.4.5 first ...)