Macintosh Explorer X - 4.5windows explorer like file browser |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Feedback Summary:
| This Version: | |||||
| Overall Rating: | Not rated (0.0) | Features: | Not rated (0.0) | Support: | Not rated (0.0) |
| Ease of Use: | Not rated (0.0) | Quality / Stability: | Not rated (0.0) | Price: | Not rated (0.0) |
Key to Types of Feedback:
Reviews
Troubleshooting
Usage Tips
Developer Notes
Commentary
Featured Reviews
Not worth it.. 



- Version: 4.5, 5/4/2007 07:08PM PST
smhill
Most Recent Replies: View All 1 Replies
- Not worth it..
Try Path Finder first - Version: 4.5, 2/14/2007 08:54AM PST
(0 of 2 users found this comment useful)
griff--2008Griff
Invisible Files and Demo Format - Version: 4.3, 4/5/2005 08:34PM PST
(0 of 2 users found this comment useful)
Jeff MinceyAlso, I prefer a demo period defined by elapsed time rather than by launches. Or if a given launch is less than a certain period of time -- say ten minutes -- then that could not count against the launches a user is allowed for a demo period. (And to guard against abuse of this, the product could simply fail to run after two weeks or one month.)
Most Recent Replies: View All 1 Replies
Life is short - Version: 4.2.1, 3/21/2005 01:15PM PST
(6 of 7 users found this comment useful)
harsherFor the same reason, I replaced Acrobat Reader with Preview to read pdf files, even though it doesn't offer 10 % of the features.
DiskOrder is a good example of Finder alternative that is inspired from a Windows Explorer alternative, and it's actually faster than the Finder. I'll stick to that, even though I prefer more the Macintosh Explorer's concept.
I'll check future versions, and I hope the developper won't simply get defensive and try to convince me that speed is not an issue in this case.
Most Recent Replies: View All 3 Replies
- Life is short (3 replies)
Useful 



- Version: 4.2.1, 12/21/2004 01:50PM PST
(6 of 8 users found this comment useful)
Wappie3 stars for the attempt! And oh ja: please loose the carbon thing, go cocoa!
Most Recent Replies: View All 7 Replies
Macintosh Explorer 4.2, & Mac OS 10.3.6 - Version: 4.2, 11/28/2004 08:13AM PST
(3 of 4 users found this comment useful)
philharve
Tried the trial - Version: 4.2, 11/22/2004 02:45PM PST
blizzaster
BUT, it crashed hard when I used the Finder to disconnect a network drive (which had not even been viewed in Explorer X) - so it went straight to the trash. Finder-like tools which crash on the first run can't be kept around.
Interesting App 



- Version: 4.1, 7/22/2004 03:00AM PST
WhiteDog
And finally, though this is not the author's fault, with the Finder window improvements in Panther, including the Side Panel, most of the advantages of Macintosh Explorer are gone, except for the occasional Windows convert.
I didn't think I'd like it at first because of the size it added to Finder windows, but the Side Panel has grown on me and now makes navigating Finder windows a snap. So I have no real need for a Finder replacement.
Most Recent Replies: View All 1 Replies
You might try using another name... - Version: 4.1, 7/21/2004 01:51PM PST
Saints1
Most Recent Replies: View All 2 Replies
When I actually started to use it regularly, I found it to be a really poor substitute for the finder. In fact it is a really poor product in general. It is really slow, buggy and awkward. It is missing many of the general features you that you get for free in the finder. It crashes often, and is slow to refresh. It is also missing keyboard shortcuts. Just using the finder is much more efficient and productive.
In general the idea is sound, but this is very poorly designed and executed.
Huge thumbs down.