Existing users, 
 Time Ballz - 2.3.1clock screensaver of small, rotating shapes |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Feedback Summary:
| This Version: | |||||
| Overall Rating: | Not rated (0.0) | Features: | Not rated (0.0) | Support: | Not rated (0.0) |
| Ease of Use: | Not rated (0.0) | Quality / Stability: | Not rated (0.0) | Price: | Not rated (0.0) |
Key to Types of Feedback:
Reviews 
Troubleshooting 
Usage Tips 
Developer Notes 
Commentary 
Featured Reviews
No Intel version - Version: 2.3.1, 8/30/2008 08:14AM PST
(1 of 1 users found this comment useful)
Richard G. Hallas
Keep coming back to it... 
- Version: 2.3.1, 1/16/2006 05:56AM PST
Radar323
I love this screen saver. Been a registered user for years. It just works and it looks great.
My only question is: "Will we ever get an expanded ballz set?"
Thanks for making good software.
My only question is: "Will we ever get an expanded ballz set?"
Thanks for making good software.
Classy! - Version: 2.3.1, 11/19/2003 03:11AM PST
inspired
Very nice. Very nice.
Would be neat if the screenSaver would also display monochrome versions of a User's Pictures folder using ballz, too. That would probably be worth $10 :)
Also, just for fun, because there is a set of ballz that uses transparency (so I can use xBack and *not* completely cover up my desktop picture...*very* cool), it would be neat if there were a way to set the position of the clock on the screen.
Way better than any K clock Widget, that's for sure....
Would be neat if the screenSaver would also display monochrome versions of a User's Pictures folder using ballz, too. That would probably be worth $10 :)
Also, just for fun, because there is a set of ballz that uses transparency (so I can use xBack and *not* completely cover up my desktop picture...*very* cool), it would be neat if there were a way to set the position of the clock on the screen.
Way better than any K clock Widget, that's for sure....
This was one of my favourite screensavers, and I paid the $2 for it.
However, the current version dates from 2003 and is PowerPC only. It can't be used on Intel Macs, which is very frustrating.
Although the developer's site is still online, the email address given there no longer works (emails sent to it just bounce). Please, developer, update this excellent saver for Intel Macs! This is all the more important because you asked money for this saver. Users of freeware that doesn't get updated haven't that much cause for complaint, but screensavers are rather trivial things to be asked to pay for in any case, so to take money and then fail to produce essential compatibility updates seems a little naughty. (OK, the registration fee for this one was extremely small, but even so, it's the principle that counts.)