Existing users, log in.  New users, create a free account.  Lost password?

Mac OS X  |  Web & Software Development  |  Debug / Profile  |  DTerm

DTerm

DTerm - 3.2

Instrumentation libraries that can be left in shipping code

All Time: Not rated (0.0)
This Version: Not rated (0.0)
Current Version: 3.2
Release Date: 2003-02-05
License: Commercial
Downloads (this version): 1,050
Downloads (all versions): 5,419
Price: $50.00

Information Related to Version:

Broken Link? Newer Version? Tell us!

Product Description:

DTerm provides an interface for displaying instrumentation information in real-time from your programs. Each program has its own window, and DTerm can intelligently merge the contents of multiple windows into a single window, showing the interactions between multiple programs. In addition, DTerm can display the formatted contents of data structures with a single call.

What's new in this version:

  • Changed from a fixed-length message storage to dynamic-length, to permit more messages to be stored.
  • Added the ability to specify a default message storage of 4K to 512K, with a default of 64K.
  • Added the ability to specify a session's message storage from 4K to 512K.
  • Fixed some incompatibilities with the Mach-O library and ProjectBuilder.
  • Changed the Release Notes in text format to a Read Me, in HTML format.
  • Updated the documentation.
  • Monitoring apps created with DTerm now will store the current default settings for new session windows as the preferences for the monitoring app. Preferences currently saved are: display of time and date information, toolbar visibility, confirm save on close, and buffer size.

Operating System Requirements:

This product is designed to run on the following operating systems:

  • Mac OS X 10.2
  • Mac OS X 10.1
  • Mac OS X 10.0
  • Mac OS Classic

Additional Requirements:

  • Mac OS 9 - OS X

Screenshots:

Download Links:

Your Installed Versions:


 

Feedback Summary:

This Version:
Overall Rating: Not rated (0.0) Features: Not rated (0.0) Support: Not rated (0.0)
Ease of Use: Not rated (0.0) Quality / Stability: Not rated (0.0) Price: Not rated (0.0)
Add Your Feedback

Key to Types of Feedback:

ReviewsReviews   TroubleshootingTroubleshooting   Usage TipsUsage Tips   Developer NotesDeveloper Notes   CommentaryCommentary   Featured ReviewsFeatured Reviews

DTerm CommentaryWe consider e-mail… - Version: 3.0.2, 1/5/2003 12:44AM PST

Austin-Soft.com (Austin-Soft.com)
a very critical communications tool, so we answer all e-mail. We've been investigating setting up an e-mail list, but have yet to find an acceptable solution. We have not considered using a webboard because of the confidentiality of some of the communications.
Post a commentAlert Admin

DTerm CommentaryI agree VERY… - Version: 3.0.2, 12/21/2002 11:26AM PST

jwiede
strongly with harleyb's comment: Devs giving themselves self-serving (e.g. star-inclusive) reviews is CLEARLY against the VT ToS, and Austin-Soft.com should replace that review with one using "n/a" instead. It's not up to the dev to decide what star reviews are "valid", the whole point of the VT system is to allow folks to give _dev unmoderated_ reviews and ratings. As opposed to dev sites where they typically only allow "good" reviews. Gotta take the bad with the good, and if you feel heynnema's review is undeserved, convince them to change it by showing them what they're looking for in your product.
Post a commentAlert Admin

DTerm CommentaryI believe what… - Version: 3.0.2, 12/21/2002 11:25AM PST

jwiede
heynnema is looking for as a support site is a support "board" instead of just an email address. Reasonable request for a commercial product, in my book, as it's quite easy for a company to ignore email (not saying AustinSoft does, just that other companies do). Having a support board gives customers obvious indication of how quickly and well a dev responds to support requests. Given the vast array of free "webboard" offerings, it's something AustinSoft ought to consider for a developer-targeted product of this nature (since it will intrinsically generate more, and more complex, support requests than, say, a simple user-targeted app).
Post a commentAlert Admin