Existing users, 
 Seagull - 3.0watch vidcasts, make video playlists, output to devices |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Feedback Summary:
| This Version: | |||||
| Overall Rating: | Not rated (0.0) | Features: | Not rated (0.0) | Support: | Not rated (0.0) |
| Ease of Use: | Not rated (0.0) | Quality / Stability: | Not rated (0.0) | Price: | Not rated (0.0) |
Key to Types of Feedback:
Reviews 
Troubleshooting 
Usage Tips 
Developer Notes 
Commentary 
Featured Reviews
Nice UI, but that's about it 
- Version: 3.0b3, 9/18/2005 10:26PM PST
(1 of 1 users found this comment useful)
robbyx--2008
Not likely to get my money - Version: 2.5, 4/7/2005 01:47AM PST
(1 of 1 users found this comment useful)
twitterpated
The app gives the appearance that it imports formats it can't view, leaving you with a useless icon in the library
It struggled with .mpg files, which I consider to be fairly standard (if Quicktime can handle it with less trouble, you're app probably blows)
It's slow to respond, and sometimes completely unresponsive.
If there are problems beyond that, I don't know them, because I was so disgusted I stopped using it almost immediately
I'd say the developer is slightly delusional if he/she thinks they're going to get someone to pay $90 for this without some MAJOR revisions
It struggled with .mpg files, which I consider to be fairly standard (if Quicktime can handle it with less trouble, you're app probably blows)
It's slow to respond, and sometimes completely unresponsive.
If there are problems beyond that, I don't know them, because I was so disgusted I stopped using it almost immediately
I'd say the developer is slightly delusional if he/she thinks they're going to get someone to pay $90 for this without some MAJOR revisions
No need for… - Version: 2.3, 12/2/2002 09:42AM PST
(1 of 1 users found this comment useful)
Slash
these hasty comments. If you read the information carefully, you'll see that it only costs $89.95. Where you got this outrageously preposterous $90 price tag, I have no idea!
$90 for the… - Version: 2.3, 11/28/2002 04:55PM PST
(1 of 1 users found this comment useful)
Freddie88
pro version, you have to be kidding. This has to be the crappiest program I have ever seen. I would be happier if the called it the AMATEUR version and charged a penny. That is what it is worth.
Wow. Cellulo beats… - Version: 2.3, 11/27/2002 11:44PM PST
(1 of 1 users found this comment useful)
Typhoon
this app into the ground in every concievable way, and at an unbeatable price. Check it out.
Please, oh please… - Version: 2.3, 11/27/2002 04:55PM PST
(1 of 1 users found this comment useful)
Typhoon
tell me that the $90 price tag is some sort of sick joke on the part of the author.
what exactly would… - Version: 2.3, 11/27/2002 01:21PM PST
sonic death monkey
be the point of purchasing this program for $90 dollars, when quicktime pro (which costs $30) has more functionality?
i have already… - Version: 2.2.1, 8/31/2002 03:59PM PST
mark_ringenoldus
made my own Video player and Playlist. for:0000000000$
Ugly, expensive crap.… - Version: 2.0, 8/29/2002 05:48PM PST
Typhoon
Get Cellulo off version tracker, it does everything this app does for free and with a nicer interface. Some of the "features" listed on the product's site are things we take for granted in every mac application, i'm surprised they didn't include "double-click to launch!" as a feature.
I just don't get it. QuickTime plays ALL of my video files effortlessly, regardless of format, yet the minute I import them into one of these so-called video organizers, the playback is lousy. Don't these programs use QuickTime??? What's the problem?
Seagull often refused to play my video files. Sometimes it would play them at normal size, but simply show me a big blank window if I tried to increase or decrease the on-screen size. More often than not, however, playing a video clip resulted in an empty window appearing.
Can't someone write a decent iPhoto for video clips??? I'd gladly pay for one that WORKS.