Melodyne - 1.5Musical multitrack audio editor |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Feedback Summary:
| Version 1.5: | |||||
| Overall Rating: | Features: | Not rated (0.0) | Support: | Not rated (0.0) | |
| Ease of Use: | Not rated (0.0) | Quality / Stability: | Not rated (0.0) | Price: | Not rated (0.0) |
Key to Types of Feedback:
Reviews
Troubleshooting
Usage Tips
Developer Notes
Commentary
Featured Reviews
Worth every penny if you're a vocalist, or producer/record them - Version: 3.2.2, 3/14/2009 02:57PM PST
Superstitious
Expensive!!! 



- Version: 3.2, 7/13/2007 09:37PM PST
(1 of 4 users found this comment useful)
mattgranz
The price is prohibitive to even wanting to try it out. I think I'll stick to my ProTools. Thank you!
Holly Smokes - Version: 3.2, 7/13/2007 09:02PM PST
(2 of 6 users found this comment useful)
Ancient_Boii_Tribe
I already have ALL the great sound edit apps. I think I'll pass on this and buy a new computer instead.
But, we're talking about their top tier app, here. There are less expensive less feature-rich versions of Melodyne available, like Melodyne UNO. If you have another multi-track program and just want to polish a vocal track, consider that one. There is also a plug-in.
Adobe Creative Suite is really expensive. Office is really expensive. Frankly, I think Melodyne is a much better value than Microsoft Office, and how many more people buy that?
This software's most impressive feature is how well it adjusts defects in vocal takes without sounding artificial. It can save a lot of studio time and studio time is expensive. If you're on a limited budget like I am, you can do a lot more songs because you don't have to do so many takes of each one.
One thing that I'm unhappy about, though, is that the Spitfish plug-in doesn't work in this version. It did work in 3.0.1.5. The audio units version of the plug-ins isn't seen at all, and the VST versions no longer work.