Existing users, log in.  New users, create a free account.  Lost password?

Mac OS X  |  Audio / Video  |  Converters  |  VideoK

VideoK

VideoK - 1.3.5

Video compressor that uses a space-saving codec.

All Time: (2.0)
This Version: Not rated (0.0)
Current Version: 1.3.5
Release Date: 2009-10-09
License: Shareware
Downloads (this version): 284
Downloads (all versions): 1,295
Price: $11.99

Information Related to Version:

Broken Link? Newer Version? Tell us!

Product Description:

VideoK a new innovative video Player for Mac Users implementing a new breakthrough technology that will enable you to optimize space without losing out on performance establishing a unique approach to allow the best tradeoffs between storage size and image quality therefore fulfilling gaps in the needs of the digital imaging market.

This unique easy to use player will allow you to convert any video file to the new codec JPDMovie (JPDM independent pre-filter to H.264) enhancing your picture definition saving up to 30% on memory space (on the actual H264 standard).

Video Format: Mov and m4v QuickTime compatible (JPDM, independent pre-filter to H.264). JPDM vs. Lossy video format: 30% reduction with improved image quality.

  • Drag and Drop
  • QuickLook
  • Growl support
  • Sparkle updater
  • And a new component for QuickTime

What's new in this version:

Now running on Mac OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard.

Operating System Requirements:

This product is designed to run on the following operating systems:

  • Mac OS X 10.5 Intel
  • Mac OS X 10.5 PPC

Screenshots:

Download Links:

Your Installed Versions:


 

Feedback Summary:

This Version:
Overall Rating: Not rated (0.0) Features: Not rated (0.0) Support: Not rated (0.0)
Ease of Use: Not rated (0.0) Quality / Stability: Not rated (0.0) Price: Not rated (0.0)
Add Your Feedback

Key to Types of Feedback:

ReviewsReviews   TroubleshootingTroubleshooting   Usage TipsUsage Tips   Developer NotesDeveloper Notes   CommentaryCommentary   Featured ReviewsFeatured Reviews

VideoK ReviewOddball program with limited utility - Version: 1.3.4, 7/21/2009 11:48PM PST

jsevakis
Boy, this is an odd one. First, I'm well aware of the need for some decent denoising in the Quicktime world. I often have to boot up VMWare so I can use Windows video processing utilities like AVIsynth to clean up my video before I do my encoding. Denoising does do wonders for compression, and I would not do web video without it if I had a choice. A decent alternative on the Mac side would save me a lot of time and trouble.

I can't see myself using this program, though. FIrst of all, its interface is bizarre and wonky, full of bad English and nonstandard interface choices. The installer even forces you to add the program to your dock, which is just not cool. There's also a stunningly useless info window, that tells you the file type of your input file (gee thanks, couldn't tell THAT from the file name!) and its source aspect ratio. (No mention of its frame rate, compression format, or anything useful.) There are no settings, other than Quicktime's standard export options. The program also handles 4:3 aspect ratio strangely, resizing everything to 16:9 for display.

As for its output, I tested it with a noisy direct-from-camera h.264 clip, and exported using one-pass h.264 at medium setting. (I would never use Quicktime's h.264 codec for web, but it was just a test.) The file size was quite a bit smaller than doing the same directly from Quicktime Player: 9.6 megs rather than 12.3. The video quality was very slightly softer and blockier, but I really had to strain to notice a difference.

The thing is, there's no point to making this a program at all. The filter itself might be quite useful, if it simply acted as a Quicktime filter that one could check during export. That way it might be used directly from Final Cut Pro or another program without an intermediate step. Having its own interface limits its usefulness, and THIS interface is just a liability. For a program that already has limited utility, this just has too many problems to be useful. Sorry, I'm sticking with my Windows-based solution.
Post a commentAlert Admin