Existing users, log in.  New users, create a free account.  Lost password?

Mac OS X  |  Internet  |  Browsers  |  CutX

CutX

CutX - 4.5.1

Surf the Web without seeing harmful or pornographic sites.

All Time: Not rated (0.0)
This Version: Not rated (0.0)
Current Version: 4.5.1
Release Date: 2009-01-03
License: Update
Downloads (this version): 563
Downloads (all versions): 567
Price: $49.00

Information Related to Version:

Broken Link? Newer Version? Tell us!

Product Description:

CutX allows children or employees of a company to surf the Web without the risks of being exposed to harmful or pornographic Web sites. It allows parents or network administrators to manage a keyword list. When a keyword is found in a web page, all pictures are automatically hidden. Now, you can rest more easily knowing your children or employees can safely explore the Web.

Operating System Requirements:

This product is designed to run on the following operating systems:

  • Mac OS X 10.5 Intel
  • Mac OS X 10.5 PPC
  • Mac OS X 10.4 Intel
  • Mac OS X 10.4 PPC

Screenshots:

Download Links:

Your Installed Versions:


 

Feedback Summary:

This Version:
Overall Rating: Not rated (0.0) Features: Not rated (0.0) Support: Not rated (0.0)
Ease of Use: Not rated (0.0) Quality / Stability: Not rated (0.0) Price: Not rated (0.0)
Add Your Feedback

Key to Types of Feedback:

ReviewsReviews   TroubleshootingTroubleshooting   Usage TipsUsage Tips   Developer NotesDeveloper Notes   CommentaryCommentary   Featured ReviewsFeatured Reviews

CutX CommentaryWhat's a harmful web site? - Version: 4.5.1, 1/3/2009 09:26PM PST

(1 of 2 users found this comment useful)

mcg--2008
Are we talking about Phishing here? Or Trojan Horses? No, I think we're talking about pictures. I have no objection to the fact that parents and employers want to control the kinds of information available to those in their charge (though that would not be my own choice, since I am interested in empowered children and employees), but I do object to the use of the word "harmful" if there is no evidence of harm. Therefore, I have a question for the developers:

What rigorous evidence do you have that the things you stop people from seeing are actually harmful?
Post a commentAlert Admin

Most Recent Replies: View All 1 Replies