Existing users, log in.  New users, create a free account.  Lost password?

Mac Classic  |  Math/Scientific  |  ConverTable Units

ConverTable Units

ConverTable Units - 2.5

unit converter, unique tutor shows the math

All Time: (3.0)
This Version: Not rated (0.0)
Current Version: 2.5
Release Date: 2005-01-27
License: Commercial
Downloads (this version): 1,240
Downloads (all versions): 11,004
Price: $15.00

Information Related to Version:

Broken Link? Newer Version? Tell us!

Product Description:

ConverTable Units TEACHES how to do unit conversions. Just click the "show tutor" triangle, and ConverTable Units shows you how it is "thinking" about the conversion you've asked it to do. In fact, ConverTable Units "thinks" about conversions using a "unit cancellation" method widely taught in high school and college science courses. By showing how conversions are done, (not just spitting out an answer!) ConverTable Units represents a great teaching and learning tool.

What's new in this version:

  • improved Velocity/Speed built-in category
  • updated contact information and license

Operating System Requirements:

This product is designed to run on the following operating systems:

  • Mac OS Classic

Additional Requirements:

  • Mac OS 8.1 or higher

Screenshots:

Download Links:

Your Installed Versions:


 

Feedback Summary:

This Version:
Overall Rating: Not rated (0.0) Features: Not rated (0.0) Support: Not rated (0.0)
Ease of Use: Not rated (0.0) Quality / Stability: Not rated (0.0) Price: Not rated (0.0)
Add Your Feedback

Key to Types of Feedback:

ReviewsReviews   TroubleshootingTroubleshooting   Usage TipsUsage Tips   Developer NotesDeveloper Notes   CommentaryCommentary   Featured ReviewsFeatured Reviews

ConverTable Units ReviewI like this… - Version: 2.2, 1/19/2003 12:09AM PST

Nick Sloan
program: It is well though-out, helpful and customizable, and deserves a five star review to bring up an undeservedly low average.
Post a commentAlert Admin

ConverTable Units CommentaryTo clarify, picarule… - Version: 1.9, 6/12/2002 09:54AM PST

Synergy Creations
is referring to the "Computer Memory" category in ConverTable Units, and specifically, the question of "how many bytes are in a kilobyte/megabyte/etc.?" Historically a kilobyte has been 1024 bytes (the MacOS, Windows, and memory chips use this kilobyte). More recently some sources call it 1000 bytes. (Notably hard drive makers-- a 1000 byte kilobyte makes the "gigabyte" a bit smaller so the drive's reported capacity in gigabytes becomes a bit larger.) Computer scientists rounded off the nearest power of 2 to 1000 (2^10=1024) and started using the "kilo-" prefix for a binary system based on powers of 2, rather than the powers of 10 metric system which the prefix "kilo-" is properly part of. ConverTable Units has, since version 1.9, included both definitions of the kilobyte, because clearly both are in use today. We call 1000 bytes a "kilobyte" (in line with the metric prefix) and 1024 bytes a "kilobyte-binary". This is not an "invented" unit to be dishonest or create confusion; it is a label to differentiate between two otherwise identically named "kilobytes" in a menu! The standards picarule refers to say that one should call 1000 bytes "kilobyte" (as ConverTable Units does) and 1024 bytes "kibibyte". This avoids the current confusion of having the "kilo-" prefix indicating a multiple other than 1000. However, these new prefixes are not well known or in wide use today. (Apple doesn't even use the prefixes in the MacOS.) Despite what picarule claims, we do mention these standards, in three places in fact: ConverTable Units' Read Me file, the Available Units file, and ConverTable Units' built-in help. Further, the binary multiple kibibyte, mebibyte, etc. terms are available as a plug-in for registered users, and have been since version 1.9, posted on January 7, 2002.
Post a commentAlert Admin

ConverTable Units ReviewWhatever advantage this… - Version: 1.9, 1/10/2002 01:14AM PST

picarule
program may have over other, similar products is outweighed by the author's intellectual dishonesty. Rather than follow (or even mention) the standards set forth by the National Institute of Standards and Technology for binary multiples, he invents terms and reports them as fact. This, *after* being made newly aware of the *existence* of such standards.
Post a commentAlert Admin