Existing users, log in.  New users, create a free account.  Lost password?

Mac Classic  |  Drivers  |  Epson PhotoPC series

Epson PhotoPC series

Epson PhotoPC series - updates

twain, uploader & direct print drivers for the digital cameras

All Time: (1.0)
This Version: (1.0)
Current Version: updates
Release Date: 1999-08-11
License: Update
Downloads (this version): 1,048
Downloads (all versions): 1,048

Information Related to Version:

Broken Link? Newer Version? Tell us!

Operating System Requirements:

This product is designed to run on the following operating systems:

  • Mac OS Classic

Additional Requirements:

  • Mac OS X 10.4 PPC
  • Mac OS X 10.3.9
  • Mac OS X 10.4 Intel
  • Mac OS X 10.0
  • Mac OS X 10.1
  • Mac OS X 10.5 PPC
  • Mac OS X 10.2
  • Mac OS X 10.5 Intel
  • Mac OS X 10.3
  • Mac OS Classic

Screenshots:

Your Installed Versions:


 

Feedback Summary:

This Version:
Overall Rating: (1.0) Features: Not rated (0.0) Support: Not rated (0.0)
Ease of Use: Not rated (0.0) Quality / Stability: Not rated (0.0) Price: Not rated (0.0)
Add Your Feedback

Key to Types of Feedback:

ReviewsReviews   TroubleshootingTroubleshooting   Usage TipsUsage Tips   Developer NotesDeveloper Notes   CommentaryCommentary   Featured ReviewsFeatured Reviews

Epson PhotoPC series ReviewI bought an… - Version: updates, 6/23/2001 10:51AM PST

Tradigital Photo
Epson PhotoPC Model 750z last year and at the same time their latest Photo printer which was an Epson Stylus Photo 1200. I had read a great review of the camera in digital photographer and indeed it worked very well, with one GIANT flaw. The camera was supposed to be able to print on an Epson Stylus photo printer with uploadable software that came with the camera. However, as I had bought this camera as a backup to my Nikon Coolpix 950, I didn't use it for a while and when I finally did I discovered that the Direct Print from camera won't work to an Epson Photo 1200 and I kept searching for a new "driver" thinking one day it would. Finally almost 6 months had passed and as is the case with any new digital products Epson brought out the Epson Photo PC850Z which I found would work for "direct print" to an Epson Photo 1200. Also Epson brought out its newer Epson Stylus Photo 1270 model which will work with my digital camera model. I tried to exchange the camera which was only used a couple of times or trade it in on the new 850Z so I could do what I wanted, that is print directly from camera without lugging along my G3 Mac to do so (I do classic car photos for local clubs). Anyways now I have to bring home the pix on my Compactflash card, read the card with my Sandisk reader, load the excellent but slow Sierra Epson Photo print software that came on a CD with my camera, but overall I feel really "ripped off", especially from my dealer who couldn't tell me it was incompatible and said my $1000 Canadian for the Epson PhotoPC 750Z was now worth less than 1/2 of what I paid for it. To make things worth the Epson Photo 1200 printer was replaced also and colour ink cartridges for it are really difficult to get (except by special order) in most computer or camera stores in Winnipeg (Manitoba Canada) where I live. Generally then I fell really ripped off by Epson. I have been a professional photographer (Weddings) p
Post a commentAlert Admin

Epson PhotoPC series ReviewWell, guess I… - Version: updates, 6/23/2001 10:51AM PST

Tradigital Photo
was a little long winded (comes from 35 years as a teacher). It seems my review was cut off. Anyways to continue........... .....I was a professional wedding photographer (during the summers when teachers are not working) for over 25 years and was also an expert at developing both color and B&W prints which I entered in competitions which I did as an amateur. Well I think I was saying that the Epson 1200 was attractive to me to buy (review again in Digital Photographer magazine) due to its being the only wider "carriage" model so I could print 13x19 prints and even 13x42 posters with the roll paper. I couldn't afford the $3000 an Epson 3000 costs in Canada, and besides it isn't a photo printer but did have the neat economy of separate primary color ink cartridges. I think Epson gets carried away (not unlike other printer companies) of creating immediate redundancy of their equipment just so they can sell those expensive ink cartridges and expensive glossy photo papers (which by the way fade pretty quickly and they avoid that issue). I did some of my own testing, even with the megaexpensive Photo Film which is more permanent and waterproof, but they have a long way to go. I bought an ALPS 5000 dye sub/micro dry printer which is slower, takes only 8 1/2" wide paper but at least is much more permanent. I challenge Epson to answer me, and if you don't I'll even stomp on my Seiko watch which by the way works well and looks good. Try following the example of your parent company! Ron Bodner Winnipeg, MB Email: rbodner@home.com
Post a commentAlert Admin