Existing users, log in.  New users, create a free account.  Lost password?

Mac Classic  |  Security  |  AbsoluteTrash

AbsoluteTrash

AbsoluteTrash - 2.1

Encryption/security app with permanent file deletion

All Time: (1.0)
This Version: Not rated (0.0)
Current Version: 2.1
Release Date: 2003-08-18
License: Shareware
Downloads (this version): 1,767
Downloads (all versions): 4,329
Price: $7.00

Information Related to Version:

Broken Link? Newer Version? Tell us!

Product Description:

AbsoluteTrash allows encryption of files and folders, locking and hiding the encrypted data. Also allows permanent deletion of data from drive. Has functions for backing up data to other volumes, and complete text search capabilities. Preview of documents before encrption.

What's new in this version:

File deletion function allows user to select number of passes to be completed

Operating System Requirements:

This product is designed to run on the following operating systems:

  • Mac OS Classic

Additional Requirements:

  • Mac OS 8.5 - 9.2.2

Screenshots:

Download Links:

Your Installed Versions:


 

Feedback Summary:

This Version:
Overall Rating: Not rated (0.0) Features: Not rated (0.0) Support: Not rated (0.0)
Ease of Use: Not rated (0.0) Quality / Stability: Not rated (0.0) Price: Not rated (0.0)
Add Your Feedback

Key to Types of Feedback:

ReviewsReviews   TroubleshootingTroubleshooting   Usage TipsUsage Tips   Developer NotesDeveloper Notes   CommentaryCommentary   Featured ReviewsFeatured Reviews

AbsoluteTrash ReviewThis encryption-deletion - Version: 2.1, 8/18/2003 09:54PM PST

guruosmosis
is really bad. No mention of algorithm used. More confusing to use than Chinese arithmatic. The security can not be to secure because the author states that if a password is forgotten to contact him. This, of course, suggests back doors and insecurity. His Version Tracker review states it's $7 and his read me says its $10. I want 448 bit Blow Fish--not Go-Fish.
Post a commentAlert Admin

AbsoluteTrash CommentaryAbsolute trash indeed.… - Version: 1.5, 4/18/2002 05:59PM PST

jnsimon
I agree with factory168 - there is no information on on the methods employed. Probably not the best choice for hiding your child p0rn0graphy...
Post a commentAlert Admin

AbsoluteTrash CommentaryI haven't had… - Version: 1.5, 11/9/2001 11:48PM PST

(1 of 1 users found this comment useful)

factory186
a chance to use this yet, but crucial information for any application of this sort is independent analysis of the source code to determine how secure its algorithms and processes actually are. This sort of info should be a standard part of the description of any app claiming "secure" or "encryption" features.
Post a commentAlert Admin