Adobe FrameMaker - 7.0p577long document publishing tool |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Feedback Summary:
| This Version: | |||||
| Overall Rating: | Not rated (0.0) | Features: | Not rated (0.0) | Support: | Not rated (0.0) |
| Ease of Use: | Not rated (0.0) | Quality / Stability: | Not rated (0.0) | Price: | Not rated (0.0) |
Key to Types of Feedback:
Reviews
Troubleshooting
Usage Tips
Developer Notes
Commentary
Featured Reviews
Like another guy… 



- Version: 6.0, 7/19/2002 07:11AM PST
macaholic
said, this is the only app that requires me to boot Classic. Versioin 7.1 better be Cocoa or carbonized and soon!
For me there… 



- Version: 6.0, 7/3/2002 02:36PM PST
Rui Batista1
is one app left on os9... FRAME... damnit adobe. You have Frame 3.0 code for NeXTSTEP/OpenStep, use it create a Cocoa Frame based on the Unix environment not a carbonated kludge. Until it ships on OSX I'm sticking to 3.0 on NeXTSTEP or 5.5 on my old powerbook... you're not getting a penny from me.
There was a… 



- Version: 6.0, 5/21/2002 12:38AM PST
ranya
time FrameMaker was best-in-class, but that was before it became alone-in-class. Now, like so many other Adobe products, new releases are cycled to maintain revenue flow (as versions are not backward-compatible), rather than major changes to the core application engine. Minor releases only fix major bugs. My Frame 5.5 runs under Classic, so I'm not sure what the point of 6 and 7 were. No doubt it is a superior Word Processor, but that's not the intended use of this once-great app; it is a technical documentation production app, or was. Maybe when the native OS/X version comes out, and I have the $$ to also update my Unix boxes (no backward compatiblity, remember)....but not now. As a "Major" release: 1 star. As an app, still gets 3 (down from 5 in Frame 4).