Existing users, 
 Crypt3 - 20100107Drag & drop file and folder encryption. |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Feedback Summary:
| This Version: | |||||
| Overall Rating: | Not rated (0.0) | Features: | Not rated (0.0) | Support: | Not rated (0.0) |
| Ease of Use: | Not rated (0.0) | Quality / Stability: | Not rated (0.0) | Price: | Not rated (0.0) |
Key to Types of Feedback:
Reviews 
Troubleshooting 
Usage Tips 
Developer Notes 
Commentary 
Featured Reviews
stopped working Dec 2009 - Version: 20060601, 12/22/2009 06:23AM PST
PriceD
As of sometime in Dec 2009 I can no longer encrypt binary files, I get a spinning pinwheel and must Force Quit. This is the case on both 10.5 Mac and 10.6 Mac I've tried. Still seems to work with text files.
Developer's web site is down. Is this product no longer being developed/supported?
Developer's web site is down. Is this product no longer being developed/supported?
Functions well, but... 
- Version: 20060601, 11/25/2006 08:49PM PST
blistserv
Long time user. This utility does what it is supposed to. The unregistered version will not encrypt a folder, just files, so that is not a legitimate complaint.
But...
The licensing scheme is per 'machine.' If you purchase a new computer, or get your logic board replaced, you have to buy another license. The author says it is the only way to eliminate pirating, but I feel that is bogus. Sure it is a relatively inexpensive utility, but it is not that superior to the many encrypting shareware programs at comparable cost. There may be other shareware that use this license format, (although I do not know of any,) but it is far from an acceptable standard. Computer users have come to expect that they can transfer their software to their new computer. Can you imagine if all software was licensed to a single machine? The cost of buying a new computer, and all new software, would be many thousands more.
But...
The licensing scheme is per 'machine.' If you purchase a new computer, or get your logic board replaced, you have to buy another license. The author says it is the only way to eliminate pirating, but I feel that is bogus. Sure it is a relatively inexpensive utility, but it is not that superior to the many encrypting shareware programs at comparable cost. There may be other shareware that use this license format, (although I do not know of any,) but it is far from an acceptable standard. Computer users have come to expect that they can transfer their software to their new computer. Can you imagine if all software was licensed to a single machine? The cost of buying a new computer, and all new software, would be many thousands more.
$10? Wouldn't matter if the developer paid me to use the product. Nothing short of PGP is solid enough for me.